Sunday, January 30, 2011

RSA # 2 Learning Communities and What is a, “Professional Learning Community”? by Rick DuFour
By:  Bridget Heenan
1/29/2011

            The readings from this week focused on community outcomes by improving teaching, learning, understanding, and evaluating the growth and expertise of community members.  I am going to focus on summarizing improving teaching, learning, and understanding.  I will compare and contrast Martin-Kniep’s view of these topics with those of Rick DuFour.    
            Martin-Kniep discusses in chapter six, “Participants who focus on student learning delve deeper into curriculum, instruction, and assessment work related to students.” (Martin-Kniep, 2008, p.113).  The first thing that teachers of a PLC need to focus on when trying to improve student achievement is the curriculum.  Teachers want to discuss if their current curriculum is “good”.   If the teachers feel that they do not have a “good” curriculum then they need to discuss what they can do to make it a “good” curriculum for their students.  Once the teachers have discussed and created a “good” curriculum they are going to want to discuss their teaching strategies and assessment tools. 
            It is not good enough for the teachers in a PLC to say that their students have or have not mastered a concept instead they actually need to discuss and create a good assessment tool.  Martin-Kniep mentioned that some methods for assessment might involve creating templates, discussing criteria, and or creating rubrics.  It is important for the PLC to discuss specific components of a rubric and how it would be scored.  These methods of assessment will allow for a deeper understanding of what the students have mastered and allow for teacher reflection.
            Martin-Kniep is not the only one that thinks that professional learning communities should focus on student achievement, so does Rick DuFour.  “When teacher teams develop common formative assessment throughout the school year, each teacher can identify how his or her students performed on each skill compared with other students….Each teacher has access to the ideas, materials, strategies, and talents of the entire team.”  (DuFour, 2004, p. 10)  DuFour is discussing common assessment and using a method to check student success.  DuFour does not give specific methods for grading the students work like Martin-Kniep suggested using a rubric.  A common grading rubric would also help in my opinion along with the discussion of the teaching strategies used from each member of the team.  “Teachers work in teams, engaging in an ongoing cycle of questions that promote deep team learning.  This process, in turn, leads to higher levels of student achievement.” (DuFour, 2004, p.9).  It is important to see where the students made mistakes and their level of mastery but it is also important be able to discuss and question the content covered and the teaching tactics used by all members.  If the concepts that were missed were crucial to the curriculum then it would be worth re-teaching using one of the other team member’s strategies perhaps.   
            Collaborating with a team of teachers about student achievement is crucial in the education field if all educators are serious about helping all students learn.  Two of the most important concepts that I took from both readings was that teachers need to be willing to discuss their teaching strategies as well as the results from the common assessments.  Creating a “good” curriculum that allows for teachers to develop common assessments that can be used as a reflection tool for the teachers will help student achievement.  The teachers can reflect on how many students mastered a concept, what teacher had the greatest success rate with their student’s achievement, and what teaching strategies were successful.  All of the previously stated components allow for teacher improvement as well as increasing student achievement. 

References
Martin-Kniep, G. (2008).  Communities that Learn, Lead, and Last.  San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
DuFour, R. (2004).  What is a “Professional Learning Community”?  Educational Leadership.  Retrieved from http://www.allthingsplc.info/pdf/articles/DuFourWhatIsAProfessionalLearningCommunity.pdf

Saturday, January 22, 2011

RSA #1 Implementing PLC's and Rick DuFour Groups vs Teams

By:  Bridget Heenan
1/22/2011

            The readings from this week focused on the main components of starting a Professional Learning Community (PLC) and how to assess the PLC’s standing with their goals along with how to facilitate the PLC so that the Professional Learning Community will last.  Since there were three main topics discussed within the textbook and the online assigned reading I decided to focus on just one part to the reading and that is the formation of the teams.
            In the textbook reading the author discusses how to form the PLC team as well as what the role of members within the team should entail.  The following are just small pieces of what Martin-Kniep discussed about PLC teams being formed and the members roles.  “Holds all members accountable for what they know and for what they are trying to understand.”  “They can share questions, ideas to be tested, and projects in the making.  In other words, the professional learning community is a place to belong.”  “Each member sees himself or herself not only as a professional, rigorously investigating his or her own practice, but also as a colleague helping others document and refine their practice.” (Martin-Kniep, 2008)
            In the online reading Professional Learning Communities: Sustaining School Improvement discusses the so called, “key elements” for a professional learning community.  I would like to focus on what the key elements of the PLC are according to this article because it relates to implementing the PLC.  “In a professional learning community, teachers and administrators (1) share a vision focused on student learning, (2) share leadership and decision making, and (3) work and learn together as they continually examine instructional practices – all of which are supported by strong personal and professional relationships, time for collaboration, and good communication.”  (Professional Learning Community: Sustaining School Improvement, 2003).
            If felt that both of these readings focused on people working together to accomplish the same goal so I decided to research some youtube videos on PLC’s and some of the founders of PLC’s that were listed in Martin-Kniep’s book.  I found a video by Rick DuFour who was one of the Founders of Professional Learning Communities at Stevenson High School and within the education field.  Rick DuFour discusses the difference between being in a group and being in a team.  Rick DuFour uses a sports analogy to express the difference between groups and teams. 
            After reading the textbook and the online article and watching the Rick DuFour video on groups vs teams I think that Rick DuFour describes being part of PLC in a more meaningful way than the two readings.  There are difference in the sense that Martin-Kniep says that PLC allows for people to feel a sense of belonging and Rick DuFour mentions that just belong to something does not mean you are part of a team that is working together to accomplish the same goal.  I felt that the online article was more on the same page as Rick DuFour. I agree with Rick DuFour that if you really want to see results then the PLC’s needs to take on the roles and responsibilities of team and not a group.
                       





References

Martin-Kniep, G. (2008).  Communities that Learn, Lead, and Last (77-110).  San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL).(2003). Sustaining school improvement: Professional learning community, 1 – 4. Retrieved from http://www.mcrel.org/PDF/LeadershipOrganizationDevelopment/5031TG_proflrncommfolio.pdf

DuFour, R (Creator).  Solution Tree (Poster) (2009, October 9).  Solution Tree: Rick DuFour on Groups vs. Teams [Video] Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hV65KIItlE